Starting and Naming a Business II
Starting and Naming a Business II
Starting and Naming a Business II
Order Description
Topic: Property
The paper must be at least 1,100 words (around 360 words per response for each thought).
Below are the steps for this assignment:
1. Read the Case Study – Property Prompt below
2. Read the Case Study Starting and Naming a Business – Attachment 1
3. Read the Original Response analyzing the Case Study (Starting & Naming a Business) – Attachment 2
4. Read the Paper – Respond to Various Analyzes (Thought 1, Thought 2. and Thought 3) – Attachment 3
5. Point out the areas/issues under each thought (i.e., thought 1, thought 2, and thought 3) where the writers reached a different conclusion than the Original Response. There must be a minimum of 360 to 600 words per response to each thought. Identify the points of difference in your analysis and explain how your application of the relevant law to the facts of this situation led you to a different conclusion.
6. In preparing your response to each thought (thoughts 1, 2, and 3), consider only advising Shania on which of the interested persons she should include in her business, why, and in what role(s). If she chooses not to take in a particular party, what reasoning should she give each person, if any? Your analysis must include biblical perspectives, such as biblical considerations of marriage and of business relationships with non-believers.. Identify the points of difference in your analyses and explain how your application of the relevant law to the facts of this situation led you to a different conclusion. Then, assume that Shania opened her coffeehouse and became so successful that she has 20 employees and needs to promote 1 of them to be the night shift supervisor. The employee base is quite diverse; in fact, Shania believes she should promote a racial or ethnic minority employee to demonstrate how inclusive her business has become. Explore the legal, ethical, and biblical issues if Shania makes her promotion decision entirely on that basis. What are her options? Each reply to each thought must be supported by 4 scholarly sources, other than the textbook/course materials. Each reply must be properly cited in APA format.
7. Each source must be cited in current APA format. The paper must include both full citations in a reference list at the end of each thought (i.e. thought 1, thought 2, and thought 3) paper and in-text, short citations. Acceptable sources include books, legal and business journals, legal cases, the law (cases, statutes, regulations, etc.), the Bible, biblical commentary, etc. Dictionaries and other web sources without scholarly support are not considered acceptable sources. The response under each thought must include at least 4 scholarly sources (total for the paper is at least 12). At least one citation from each thought must be from the following:
Textbook:
Kubasek, N., Brennan, B. & Browne, M. (2014). The legal environment of business: a critical
thinking approach. Boston: Pearson. (Chapters 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, & 21) as appropriate)
A Bible Commentary
8. Note per section what thought you are responding to. For example, this response is in reference to thought number
9. Each reply to each thought must not be a basic rewrite of the Original Response but a critical analysis of each though (i.e., thought 1, thought 2, and thought 3). The analysis regarding each thought must be in-depth. Specifically, state legal analysis.
Prompt (below is what the Original Response as well each thought (i.e. thought 1, thought 2, and thought 3) was based on)
1. Advise Shania on which of the business forms under consideration best accomplishes her business goals. Thoroughly explain the reasons for your recommendation.
2. Advise Shania on whether her company should become a franchise or should open as an independent coffeehouse. Explain your recommendation.
3. Perform a corporate name search at (https://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityCriteriaExt.do) to determine if the name Shania is considering is available for use in the State of Colorado. Also assess whether the name is available as a trademark. Even if the name is available, advise Shania on whether it is a good choice. Explain why or why not.
4. Advise Shania on which of the interested persons she should include in her business, why, and in what role(s). If she chooses not to take in a particular party, what reasons should she give each person, if any? Your analysis must include biblical perspectives, such as biblical considerations of marriage and of business relationships with non-believers.
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!