Student presents a detailed and thorough description of an example of a “psychic prison” that he/she or a colleague have experience in his/her organization or one with which he/she is familiar. Excellent examples and resources support thinking.

Student presents a detailed and thorough description of an example of a “psychic prison” that he/she or a colleague have experience in his/her organization or one with which he/she is familiar. Excellent examples and resources support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.

Student presents a good description of an example of a “psychic prison” that he/she or a colleague have experience in his/her organization or one with which he/she is familiar. Some examples and resources support thinking.

Student presents a cursory or incomplete description of an example of a “psychic prison” that he/she or a colleague have experience in his/her organization or one with which he/she is familiar. Few examples and resources support thinking.

Does not meet minimal standards.

Student presents a detailed and thorough explanation of how the concept of the psychic prison could be useful in understanding he/her own behavior and that of his/her employees – particularly in terms of improving the workplace environment. Excellent examples and resources support thinking.

Student presents a detailed and thorough explanation of how the concept of the psychic prison could be useful in understanding he/her own behavior and that of his/her employees – particularly in terms of improving the workplace environment. Excellent examples and resources support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.

Student presents a good explanation of how the concept of the psychic prison could be useful in understanding he/her own behavior and that of his/her employees – particularly in terms of improving the workplace environment. Some examples and resources support thinking.

Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation of how the concept of the psychic prison could be useful in understanding he/her own behavior and that of his/her employees. Few examples and resources support thinking.

Does not meet minimal standards.

Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. However, there are one or two minor errors in content of responses.

Student engages with at least two peers and helps extend the discussion. Responses are good and somewhat contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.

Student engages with at least two peers. Responses are minimal and do not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Responses may lack relevant examples and/or details to support reasoning.

Does not meet minimal standards.

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

Does not meet minimal standards.

Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

Student mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

Student demonstrates weak and/or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

Does not meet minimal standards.

not late

one day late

two days late

three days late

did not turn during discussion week.