Rubric Analysis “For NITKKR ONLY”

Using two different sources, respond in writing (APA format)
using the prompts below to guide your written analysis.Part 1:Explore the Exemplars website, specifically the Resources tab
for Rubrics. Review the Exemplars Math Rubric and Exemplars Reading
Rubric. Questions to discuss: How does the Exemplars criteria for
both math and reading rubrics follow a top-down or bottom-up
approach? How do you know? To what degree are performance level
descriptions addressed? Do these live up to what Brookhart
proposes, that “. . .the most important aspect of the levels is
that performance be described, with language that depicts what one
would observe in the work rather than the quality conclusions one
would draw” (p.26)? In your opinion, what are the values placed on
using the terminology for mastery (Novice, Apprentice,
Practitioner, and Expert)? In other words, how effective do you
believe this terminology is and why?Part 2:Explain the position Brookhart argues in Chapter 2 against
rubrics that merely summarize the requirements of the task, as
opposed to rubrics that describe evidence of learning. Explain what
Brookhart means when saying; “Rubrics should not confuse the
learning outcome to be assessed with the task used to asses it”
(p.15). What is the relationship between this and what you learned
about aligning formative assessments with the learning standards
and objectives?