Document Preview:

Evaluation Summary for Bus. Appl. for Fin., Acc. & IT: 319.1.3-01-10, 2.1-04, 2.5-05 (2008) Final Score: 3.15 (out of 4) Overall comments: The resubmission has completed the presentation section of the task; however, the ARR and payback period calculations need further revisions. Please refer to the provided comments below for details. Resubmit the revised work when ready. Detailed Results (Rubric used: FNT1-319.1.3-01-10, 2.1-04, 2.5-05) Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, word usage, ease of understandability) (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary There is no evidence of response to the prompts. The articulation of the response is weak. The articulation of the response is adequate. The articulation of the response is skillful. Criterion Score: 3.00 Accuracy of Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling) (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The work includes several major errors that disrupt the meaning or flow of the response. The work includes a few major errors and/or many minor errors that interfere with the clarity of the response. The work includes a few minor errors but no readily detectable major errors. The work includes no readily detectable major or minor errors. Criterion Score: 3.00 A1. Net Cash Flow (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The candidate does not accurately calculate the net cash flow that should be used for each year in the discounted cash flow analysis. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate accurately calculates the net cash flow that should be used for each year in the discounted cash flow analysis. Criterion Score: 4.00 A2. Net Present Value (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The candidate does not accurately calculate the net present value of this project using a discount rate equal to the company’s weighted average cost of capital. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate accurately…