my grade for previous assignment Pdf attahed

my grade for previous assignment Pdf attahed

As you know you were asked to do three things in yourpaper.  First, you were asked to define and then compare the legal terms“search” and “seizure,” and in doing so, to compare three or more elements ofthe terms.  Next, you were asked to identify one police procedure thatrelates to a search or seizure.  Finally, you were asked to develop ashort hypothetical which relates to a search or seizure, which included anethical concern that may arise with the practice, and describe whatperspectives may exist on both sides of the issue.  You were instructedthat the paper was to be a minimum of 2 pages (excluding cover and referencepage), and you were to use at least 2 sources beyond your text material.  You lost many points in every section of the paper.  Overall, I do not think you understand what the terms “search” and “seizure” mean in terms of a Fourth Amendment analysis.  The bigger problem in your paper is your writing.  I had an extremely difficult time understanding what you were trying to convey in almost ever part of the paper.  Please see the attached graded paper, and pay particular attention to my comments.  The good news is that we have a resouce here at KU that can help:  The KU Writing Center.  Please use them!  You also lost points for mechanics and proofreading issues, incorrect statements of law without citation or support, APA format (you need more citation), and an overall lack of substance.  Almost all of the substance you included was way too general, and did not include simple definitions which you can then apply to your analysis.

 

Grading Rubric

CLA CJ140-4: Describe the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process.

GEL-7.1: Identify the ethical issues within the field of constitutional law.

Unit 4 Assignment

Points Possible:

100

No Progress       Introductory      Emergent            Practiced             Proficient            Mastery               Grading Score                Relative Weight               Points

0              1              2              3              4              5

 

Identify.              Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.                Student attempted to identify the legal terms “search” and “seizure,” but was unsuccessful.    Student identified and defined either “search” or “seizure,” but not both.                Student identified and defined the legal terms “search” and “seizure” and one element of the terms.    Student identified and defined the legal terms “search” and “seizure” and two elements of the terms. Identified a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure.    Student identified and defined the legal terms “search” and “seizure” and three or more elements of the terms. Identified a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure.           1              20%        8

Research.            Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.                Student used only the text material as references.         Student used one resource beyond the text material from a source that was not credible or the credibility could not be assessed because of lack of information related to the author and sponsor.       Student used one credible resource beyond the text material. Student used at least two credible sources beyond the text material.           Student used at least two credible sources beyond the text material and discussed how they evaluated the credibility of the resources used.          4              20%        17

Describe the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process.          Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.   The student attempted to describe the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process, but fails to do so correctly.              Student described the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process by comparing one element of the terms “search” and “seizure,” describing a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure, but did not reference relevant amendments in the Bill of Rights. Did not include a hypothetical relating to search or seizure.               Student described the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process by comparing two elements of the terms “search” and “seizure,” describing a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure, but did not reference relevant amendments in the Bill of Rights. Included a hypothetical relating to search or seizure, but it was incomplete.                 Student described the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process by comparing two elements of the terms “search” and “seizure,” describing a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure, and referencing relevant amendments in the Bill of Rights. Included a hypothetical relating to search or seizure. Included an ethical concern that may arise with the practice, but did not describe what perspectives may exist on both sides of the issue.    Student clearly and correctly described the development of police procedure in relation to the concept of due process by comparing three or more elements of the terms “search” and “seizure,” describing a police procedure that relates to a search or seizure, and specifically referencing all relevant amendments in the Bill of Rights. Included a hypothetical relating to search or seizure. Included an ethical concern that may arise with the practice, and described what perspectives may exist on both sides of the issue.               1              30%        12

GEL 7.1: Identify the ethical issues within the field of constitutional law.             Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.          Student work demonstrates ability to recognize issues within their own field of study that contain ethical concerns.      Student work demonstrates the ability to identify the specific ethical concerns that are associated with field related issues.          Student work demonstrates the ability to recognize the various perspectives associated with ethical issues.          Student work demonstrates the ability to explain the reasoning that supports their perspectives or the perspectives of others on ethical issues.                Student work demonstrates the ability to identify reasoning of perspectives on ethical issues as an example of decision making that uses consequential, nonconsequential, or a virtue ethics methodology.              0              10%        0

Formatting/Layout          The Project was not submitted.                The Project was submitted, but the formatting (e.g., spacing, margins, font size, etc.) contains errors that are excessive and distracting. The title page and/or reference page may be missing. Paper is less than half of the required length.                 The Project demonstrates an attempt to adhere to the formatting guidelines as outlined in the instructions (e.g., spacing, margins, font size, etc.). Errors are not egregious. The title page or reference page may be missing. Paper is approximately half of the required length.                   For the most part, the Project adheres to the formatting guidelines as outlined in the instructions (e.g., spacing, margins, font size, etc.).  A title page and reference page are included. Paper meets the length requirements.            5              5.0%      5

Source Attribution          No attempt was made to distinguish between ideas from sources and those of the author.                  Ideas from sources are not easily distinguished from those of the author. At times, one or more of the following are used: Signal phrases, inclusion of URLs, author names, publication titles, in-text citations, and/or (when appropriate) quotation marks.                             Ideas from sources are usually distinguishable from those of the author by the use of any of the following: Signal phrases, inclusion of URLs, author names, publication titles, in-text citations, and/or (when appropriate) quotation marks.                  Ideas from sources are clearly distinguishable from those of the author by the frequent use of in-text citations and (when appropriate) quotation marks.        1              2.5%      1

Source Use/Integration                No outside sources were used. Quantity and type of sources do not entirely adhere to the requirements of the Assignment. There are more than 26% fewer sources and/or types of sources than required.                         Quantity and type of sources adhere to the requirements of the Assignment for the most part. There may be less than 25% fewer sources and/or types of sources than required.                               Quantity and type of sources adhere to the requirements of the assignment.            5              2.5%      3

Mechanics          Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.                Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors pervasive and distracting.            Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors significant and distracting.           Frequent grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.             Minor grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Technically flawless, mechanically and grammatically correct.  1                2.5%      1

Organization      Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.                Organization and structure detract from the analysis. Analysis is disjointed and lacks transition of thought.                Organization and structure are not easy to follow and interfere with meaning. Paragraph and sentence transitions need significant improvement.                Organization and structure developing but still some illogic in flow. Transition of thoughts needs some improvement.     Organization and structure are clear but presentation could be more precise. Minor flaw(s) in flow of analysis.             Organization and structure of the paper are clear and easy to follow. Logical flow of ideas.              1              5.0%      2

Language             Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.                Language inappropriate, mundane, and unfocused. No central theme or thesis present. Not written for the appropriate audience.  Random, choppy, and/or awkward language significantly detracts from analysis. Not written for the appropriate audience.          Language ordinary, imprecise, and/or lacks interest or precision. Central theme or thesis present, but not explicitly presented. Written for the appropriate audience.    Language functional, appropriate, and acceptable. Written for the appropriate audience.          Variety of sentence length and structure. Language rich, precise, and vivid. Central theme or thesis clear. Written for the appropriate audience.                1              2.5%      1

100%     Overall Grading Score:

49.5

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!