Ethical decision-making question

Ethical decision-making question

Due Date: Nov 29, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points: 200Details: Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models
in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use
the model to analyze the case provided. Case Scenario: A 6-year-old
develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and
convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby
hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis
and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The
child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian
Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for
religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another
state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and
seeks independent consultation from another physician. Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following
questions: 1. What is the ethical dilemma here? 2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings. 3. How would
you resolve this dilemma using the model? 4. Include, at the end of
your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to
the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand). A minimum of three references must be used. Prepare
this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is
not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with
the expectations for successful completion. You are required to
submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions
in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted
to Turnitin.Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice 1 Unsatisfactory 71.00%
2 Less Than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 89.00%
5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 %Content 20.0 %Identifies Ethical Dilemma
Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical
dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications.
Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications
of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the
ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed
to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited
discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications.
Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but
lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma;
or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details,
rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately
convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough
discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes
an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the
analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only
minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive.
Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying
relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed
systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail
to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly. 40.0
%Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a
decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain
significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue.
Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified
resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application,
given the context of the issue presented. More information is
needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is
needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly
distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies
resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue,
existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are
needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution.
Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment
and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for
the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of
model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and
limitations. 20.0 %Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog
is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution
based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating
the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and
its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon
issue context and the relationships of stakeholders. 15.0
%Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague;
purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and
appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and
forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim
are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of
the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent
connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are
inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but
ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between
paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of
paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are
used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors
or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format
(use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is
not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is
used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be
present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style. All format elements are correct. 3.0 %Research
Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper.
Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be
present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually
correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 %Total
Weightage

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!