Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Church of SA:

BLAW Essay Part A (1000 words) Question 1 Analyse the law (Suggested cases) Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Church of SA: *Jones V Padavattan, * Todd V Nicol *Rose & Frank V Crampton case …. —What is the legal rule? Question 2 apply the law and conclude whether Gayle will be successful in the case. Use IRAC method. –Intention to create element 4. –The case is not legally binding contract nor a breach of contract. Clearly it is only a casual agreement not a contract. Here, the case study tells us that… In conclusion, it is clear that there is NOT a binding contract between Mark and Gayle because ———. As a result, I would not recommend Gayle sue Mark for breach …. Because Part B (1000 words) Question 3 – Promisory Esptopel (Case of Waltons Stores V Maher) 21/01/2021 [In Process] 62845 – BLAW EssayPart A (1000 words)Question 1 https://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/62845/BLAW-EssayPart-A-1000-words-Question-1-Analyse-the 3/4 According to the case of Walton v Maher, Promisory Estopel is an equitable remedy which applies when —– EXPLAIN THE LAW ONLY — DO NOT REFER TO AAA PTY AND BBB PTYLD) Case example — Giumelli v Giumelli case Question 4 – Application

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!