Login
Menu

Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

Home / Blog / Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

Description
Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!