Cheap Research Papers Critiquing Internet Sources Custom Essay

1. Critiquing Internet Sources
Today, the Internet provides an unprecedented amount of information by way of blogs, videos, and podcasts. Conduct a critique of one blog, one video, and one podcast, which provide information that addresses the topic of your Final Research Paper. Assess the authors’ use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Examine the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Then, compile a list of three factors you believe should be considered when evaluating Internet sources for use in researching information.
Final Research Paper Topic – The controversy surrounding Adult Stem Cell Research
Blog – http://en.wordpress.com/tag/adult-stem-cell-research/
Video – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drFa_AHdfOk or http://www.stemcellresearchfacts.org/
Podcast – http://upclose.unimelb.edu.au/episode/132-adult-stem-cells-and-their-potential-treating-heritable-diseases
The paper must be four pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. In addition to the three multimedia sources you are analyzing, support your points with at least two scholarly sources. One of the scholarly sources must be from the Ashford Online Library (provided below). Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.
Ashford Library source –
Zarzeczny, A., & Caulfield, T. (2009). Emerging ethical, legal and social issues associated with stem cell research & and the current role of the moral status of the embryo. Stem Cell Reviews, 5(2), 96-101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-009-9062-4
The above article can be found at : http://www.sogc.org/jogc/abstracts/full/200710_HealthPolicy_1.pdf
Carefully review the Grading Rubric below for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Critiques
Total: 3.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly and comprehensively critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Assesses the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information.
Proficient – Adequately critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Assesses the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Some details could be more fully developed.
Basic – Briefly critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Critique includes a limited assessment the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Many details are lacking development.
Below Expectations – Attempts to critique one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Critique includes insufficient detail or relevance and fails to assess the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information.
Non-Performance – The critique is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Examination
Total: 2.50
Distinguished – Cohesively and clearly examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding.
Proficient – Adequately examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Some supporting details lack development.
Basic – Briefly examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Supporting details may lack adequate detail and/or relevance.
Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding; however, supporting details are insufficient and lacking in relevance.
Non-Performance – The examination is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT!

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!