Case Study: Contention, Conflict, Complexity A Conclusion assignment writing service

This work is an analysis of a contentious case pertaining to human rights. By the term ‘contentious’ it is
meant that the case is not “straight forward” because there are “layers of complexity”. For example, there
may be a ‘conflict’ of rights and responsibilities such that what is required is an analysis/discussion of the
prioritising of rights; or, the case may be highly debated within the public arena and as such, quite
“emotive”. Examples of such “conflict” of rights is that of individual rights and cultural practices; freedom
of expression and freedom from vilification. The purpose of this assessment is for students to engage with
opposing perspectives on contemporary human rights issues that enables application of theoretical
concepts and arguments to literal situations.

A dedicated Discussion Board will be established for each tutorial group during weeks 6
and 7 of semester. Students will be presented with 23
cases of human rights issues. Students are to
choose 1 case for discussion. Students must complete a minimum of 3 substantive postings in the
Discussion Thread. These postings must address previous points within the thread and illustrate application
of the literature and concepts addressed in readings, lectures and tutorials (simple “I agree/disagree” will
not be considered adequate and therefore not count in the total of postings). Students then submit the
written assignment which is an analysis of the Case and shows evidence of engagement with the points
developed through the online
Discussion and draws a conclusion based on the
literature, critique and reasoned argument. This assessment has 2 parts:
1. Discussion Board Participation Students
complete a minimum of 3 substantive postings within the 1
thread
2. Case Study Analysis Students
provide a discursive analysis of the contentious human rights issue that
illustrates engagement with the literature and the Discussion Board but is more than a repetition
of postings. Note cuttingandpasting
of postings may equate to plagiarism and could result in a charge of
academic misconduct. Students must show an integration of critique of points and arguments from the
Discussion Board; engagment and critique of the literature; clear, logical argument and conclusion.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!