can you help with this

can you help with this

Criterion	Superior Criteria (100%)	Excellent Criteria (95%)	Satisfactory Criteria (85%)	Marginal Criteria (75%)	Unacceptable Criteria (0%)	Points Possible	Evaluation  (select from drop down menu)	Points Received	Faculty Feedback
Element 1: Background Information of the Organization (10 points maximum)	Student provides a detailed and thorough description of his/her organization selected and provides salient background information of the organization. Excellent examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a detailed and thorough description of his/her selected organization and provides salient background information of the organization. Excellent examples and resources support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.	Student provides a good description of his/her selected organization and provides some background information of the organization. Some examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a cursory or incomplete description of his/her selected organization and provides minimal background information of the organization. Few examples and resources support thinking.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	85%	8.5	Carla,  Always be sure when doing an assignment to first look at the rubric for the assignment (found under Course Information).  See what is expected.  Then develop your assignment to the criteria of what the instructions say and what is expected on the rubric (preferably in the 100 percent column).  You writing did not address the major points of the assignment strongly enough.  Part of this was due to not using resources and the four frame model and the metaphors of Morgan that relate to your company. Another issue was that many of your assertions were not supported by resources. Even if you work somehwere and know things first hand, you should go back into the iiterature, the company website, etc. to support your assertions. Missing an introduction  – need purpose, intent, your position, and a roadmap of  points you covered in the paper for the reader.  Let’s work on these for next week!
Element 2: Morgan’s Use of Metaphors & Bolman and Deal’s Use of Frames (10 points maximum)	Student provides a detailed and thorough description of the current structure using both Morgan’s use of metaphors and Bolman and Deal’s use of themes. Excellent examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a detailed and thorough description of the current structure using both Morgan’s use of metaphors and Bolman and Deal’s use of themes. Excellent examples and resources support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.	Student provides good description of the current structure using both Morgan’s use of metaphors and Bolman and Deal’s use of themes. Some examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a cursory or incomplete description of the current structure using both Morgan’s use of metaphors and Bolman and Deal’s use of themes. Few examples and resources support thinking.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	75%	7.5
Element 3: Best Structure For The Organization (10 points maximum)	Student provides a detailed and thorough explanation of whether the current organizational structure is the best structure for the organization or if he/she would recommend a different structure, and provides evidence for choosing the structure he/she selected. Excellent examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a detailed and thorough explanation of whether the current organizational structure is the best structure for the organization or if he/she would recommend a different structure, and provides evidence for choosing the structure he/she selected. Excellent examples and resources support thinking. There are one or two minor errors.	Student provides good explanation of whether the current organizational structure is the best structure for the organization or if he/she would recommend a different structure, and provides evidence for choosing the structure he/she selected. Some examples and resources support thinking.	Student provides a cursory or incomplete explanation of whether the current organizational structure is the best structure for the organization or if he/she would recommend a different structure, and provides evidence for choosing the structure he/she selected. Few examples and resources support thinking.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	75%	7.5
Element 4: Organization (10 points maximum)	Student’s submission is well organized. The format is easy to follow, flows smoothly and logically from one idea to another.	Student’s submission is well organized. The format is easy to follow, flows smoothly and logically from one idea to another. There are one or two minor errors.	Student’s submission is mostly well organized and most transitions are easy to follow but, at times, ideas are unclear.	Student’s submission is inconsistent and confusing; format is difficult to follow; transitions of ideas are abrupt or distracting.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	75%	7.5
Element 5: Creativity (10 points maximum)	Student’s submission is very clever, applies new and original ideas to address the assignment in a unique way.	Student’s submission is very clever, applies new and original ideas to address the assignment in a unique way. There are one or two minor errors.	Student’s submission includes some good ideas to address the assignment presented but does not demonstrate a unique perspective.	Student’s submission shows little creative thinking and little evidence of engagement with the main ideas.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	75%	7.5
Element 6: Critical Thinking (20 points maximum)	Student’s submission exhibits critical thinking and good analytical skills. The deliverables and tasks are completed with attention to detail and show an exceptional command of the core management or organizational concepts and theories that constitute the topic of the assignment.	Student’s submission exhibits critical thinking and good analytical skills. The deliverables and tasks are completed with attention to detail and show an exceptional command of the core management or organizational concepts and theories that constitute the topic of the assignment. There are one or two minor errors.	Student’s submission exhibits some critical thinking. The deliverables and tasks are completed and show an some level of comfort and proficiency with the management or organizational concepts and theories that constitute the topic of the assignment.	Student’s submission exhibits minimal effort, without demonstrating evidence of critical thinking. The deliverables and tasks are partially, or not completed, and show an inadequate level of comfort and proficiency with the management or organizational concepts and theories that constitute the topic of the assignment.	Does not meet minimal standards.	20	75%	15
Element 7: Written Delivery Style & Grammar (10 points maximum)	Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.	Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.	Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.	Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.	Does not meet minimal standards.	10	85%	8.5
Element 8: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations) (10 points maximum)	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.	Student mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.	Student demonstrates weak and/or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!