Bus Law

Need to add more info to make a
total of 1000 words. Not counting questions and references 1.
Jose Pena and Joseph Antenucci were medical doctors who were partners in a
medical practice. Both doctors treated Elaine Zuckerman during her pregnancy.
Her son, Daniel Zuckerman, was born with severe physical problems. Elaine, as
Daniel’s mother and natural guardian, brought a medical malpractice suit
against both doctors. The jury found that Pena was guilty of medical
malpractice but that Antenucci was not. The amount of the verdict totaled $4
million. The trial court entered judgment against Pena but not against
Antenucci. Plaintiff Zuckerman made a post-trial motion for judgment against
both defendants. Is Antenucci jointly and severally liable for the medical
malpractice of his partner, Pena?
2.
Jennifer, Martin, and Edsel form a limited liability company called
Big Apple, LLC, to operate a bar in New York City. Jennifer, Martin, and
Edsel are member-managers of the LLC. One of Jennifer’s jobs as a
member-manager is to drive the LLC’s truck and pick up certain items of supply
for the bar each Wednesday. On the way back to the bar one Wednesday after
picking up the supplies for that week, Jennifer negligently runs over a
pedestrian, Tilly Tourismo, on a street in Times Square. Tilly is severely
injured and sues Big Apple, LLC, Jennifer, Martin, and Edsel to recover
monetary damages for her injuries. Who is liable?
3.
Joseph M. Billy was an employee of the USM Corporation (USM), a publicly held
corporation. Billy was at work when a 4,600-pound ram from a vertical boring
mill broke loose and crushed him to death. Billy’s widow sued, alleging that
the accident was caused by certain defects in the manufacture and design of the
vertical boring mill and the two moving parts directly involved in the
accident, a metal lifting arm and the 4,600-pound ram. If Mrs. Billy’s suit is
successful, can the shareholders of USM be held personally liable for any
judgment against USM?
4.
The McDonald Investment Company was a corporation organized and incorporated in
the state of Minnesota. The principal and only place of business from which the
company conducted operations was Rush City, Minnesota. More than 80 percent of
the company’s assets were located in Minnesota, and more than 80 percent of its
income was derived from Minnesota. McDonald sold securities to Minnesota
residents only. The proceeds from the sale were used entirely to make loans and
other investments in real estate and other assets located outside the state of
Minnesota. The company did not file a registration statement with the SEC. Does
this offering qualify for an intrastate offering exemption from registration?

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!