assignment help from kishore

assignment help from kishore

Hello there, please see the assignment instructions below. I’ve also attached the students paper that you must respond to. Please read entire email. Reply Prompt instructions: Reply to the threads of another classmate who reached a different conclusion than you did on at least 1 of the issues under discussion. Identify the points of difference in your analysis and explain how your application of the relevant law to the facts of this situation led you to a different conclusion. Each reply must be supported by 3 scholarly sources other than the textbook/course materials. Each source must be properly cited in current APA format.
Assignment instruction. I’ve attached the students paper for. I’ve highlighted in the paper the section that the student and I came to a different conclusion. The section is about the beach property and Eminent domain. I want you to respond that he misinterpreted the law. The correct response should be that the city cannot take the beach house because, they are doing so on behalf of a third party and it will not benefit the general public. Find at least scholarly sources that support eminent domain that prove that my interpretation was correct and his was off.
Must be at least 3 pages. Also, I want you to talk about his Christian perspective in the very last paragraph of the paper. Talk about how Christ preaches forgiveness and that Martin should forgive Andrew, Otis and Benjamin and the car dealer., You should throw in some bible verses and scriptures that talks about forgiveness and second chances and talk about how they apply.
Please refer to the case study if you need to. I already sent you a copy of the case study. It is case study 2-property.
Attachments
db2.docx
Discussion_Board_Forum_2_Case_Study.docx

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!