Alternati v e methods of joint- c o s t al l ocation, p r oduct-mix decisions.
Alternati v e methods of joint- c o s t al l ocation, p r oduct-mix decisions.
Schmidsendl GmbH buys crude vegetable oil. Refining this oil results in four products at the split-off point: A, B, C and D. Product C is fully processed at the split-off point.
Products A, B and D can be individually further refined into Super A, Super B and Super D.
In the most recent month (December), the output at the split-off point was:
Product A 300 000 litres Product B 100 000 litres Product C 50 000 litres Product D 50 000 litres
The joint costs of purchasing the crude vegetable oil and processing it were €100 000. Schmidsendl had no beginning or ending stocks. Sales of product C in December were
€50 000. Total output of products A, B and D was further refined and then sold. Data related to December are as follows:
Separable processing costs
to make super products Sales
Super A | €200 000 | €300 000 |
Super B | 80 000 | 100 000 |
Super D | 90 000 | 120 000 |
Schmidsendl had the option of selling products A, B and D at the split-off point. This alter- native would have yielded the following sales for the December production:
Product A | €50 000 |
Product B | 30 000 |
Product D | 70 000 |
Required
1 What is the gross-margin percentage for each product sold in December, using the fol- lowing methods for allocating the €100 000 joint costs: (a) sales value at split-off, (b) physical measure, and (c) estimated NRV?
2 Could Schmidsendl have increased its December operating profit by making different decisions about the further refining of products A, B or D? Show the effect on operating profit of any changes you recommend.
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!