Activity-based job c o s
Activity-based job c o s
Aircomposystèmes SA has a machining facility specialising in work for the aircraft compo- nents market. The prior job-costing system had two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labour) and a single indirect-cost pool (manufacturing overhead, allocated using direct labour-hours). The indirect cost-allocation rate of the prior system for the year would have been SFr 115 per direct manufacturing labour-hour. Recently, a team with members from product design, manufacturing and accounting used an activity-based approach to refine its job-costing system. The two direct-cost categories were retained. The team decided to replace the single indirect-cost pool with five indirect-cost pools. These five cost pools represent five activity areas at the facility, each with its own supervisor and budget responsibility. Pertinent data are as follows:
Activity area | Cost driver used as allocation base | Cost-allocation rate |
Materials handling | Parts | SFr 0.40 |
Lathe work | Turns | 0.20 |
Milling | Machine-hours | 20.00 |
Grinding | Parts | 0.80 |
Testing | Units tested | 15.00 |
Information-gathering technology has advanced to the point where all the data necessary for budgeting in these five activity areas are automatically collected. Two representative jobs processed under the new system at the facility in the most recent period had the fol- lowing characteristics:
Job 410 | Job 411 | |
Direct materials cost per job | SFr 9 700 | SFr 59 900 |
Direct manufacturing labour cost per job | 750 | 11 250 |
Direct manufacturing labour-hours per job | 25 |
375 |
Parts per job | 500 | 2 000 |
Turns per job | 20 000 | 60 000 |
Machine-hours per job | 150 | 1 050 |
Units per job | 10 |
200 |
Required
1 Calculate the per unit manufacturing costs of each job under the prior job-costing system.
2 Calculate the per unit manufacturing costs of each job under the activity-based job- costing system.
3 Compare the per unit cost figures for Jobs 410 and 411 calculated in requirements 1 and
2. Why do the prior and the activity-based costing systems differ in their job cost esti- mates for each job? Why might these differences be important to Aircomposystèmes?
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!