A comparative analysis of Matthew 1-2 and Luke 1-2.

A comparative analysis of Matthew 1-2 and Luke 1-2.

ALREADY HAVE THE 3 SOURCES 1.1. Sub Topics implied in the paper • The study needs to highlight similarities and differences of vocabulary and style. • Theological themes. • Intentionality of the author: what is the reason of each of presenting his narrative in the present form. 1.2. Kind of paper • The research will produce an expository (or explanatory) paper, meaning that the manuscript explains something to an audience. • The study must be an argumentative paper that makes a claim about a topic and justifies this claim with specific evidence. The claim could be an opinion, an evaluation, a cause-and-effect statement, or an interpretation. The goal of the argumentative paper is to convince the audience that the claim is true based on the evidence provided. 2.- Required steps to follow a) You have to create a personal Title for the paper. b) Every paper must contain a “presentation sheet” (see appendix 1). c) Every paper must present immediately after the presentation Sheet a Tablet of Contents (see appendix 2). d)

A comparative analysis of Matthew 1-2 and Luke 1-2.

The paper must contain 8 pgs, including an Introduction and Conclusion. e) The Introduction must contain a Thesis Statement. Please see the guide entitled “Tips and Examples for Writing Thesis Statements” posted on Blackboard. f) At the end of the Conclusion the Bibliography must contain a minimum of 3 authors. They must be printed books or articles. g) The paper can be written in “double space” and if there is a quotation longer than 3 lines the space must be “single”. E.g.: When we talk about religious tolerance is quite useful to quote the experiences described in the Book of Daniel. In this matter Goldingay affirms: In 605 BCE, as a teenager, Daniel was captured by the Babylonian army, during its first attack on Jerusalem. He had been a member of the royal house or of the nobility. Daniel survived a castration operation and spent the rest of his long life in the city of Babylon, in the service of the royal court. He went by two names: Daniel and Belteschazzar. That city was generally regarded as the most beautiful in the known world. Ancient authorities, not known for accuracy, claimed that its walls were 60 miles long, 300 feet high and 80 feet thick. The Euphrates river divided the city into two roughly equal parts.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!